Don't believe the bad reviews of NAFTA. The North American Free Trade Agreement, which joined more than 380 million people in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, went into force on Jan. 1, 1994 -- about three and a half years ago. NAFTA received broad bipartisan support when it was ratified (especially in the West), though enthusiasm for the agreement waned as Mexico's economy tanked and increasing numbers of Americans became disenchanted with the slow pace of political reform in Mexico's authoritarian democracy.
Though you hear a lot of hand-wringing about NAFTA by leadership groups -- including most Democrats (led by House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt and the AFL-CIO), Perotistas and increasing numbers of Republicans led by presidential hopeful Pat Buchanan -- the public policy and trade achievements of NAFTA are important to recognize. Examples from recent studies compiled and released by the White House last week:
There are other positive developments, beyond those measured by dollars and cents. There are structural changes. Example: Many U.S. companies with offshore operations in Asia are now moving to Mexico, as predicted during the NAFTA debate. There have been dramatic improvements in the health and safety of the Mexican workplace. And there have been significant improvements in infrastructure and environmental quality along the border.
Though some leaders in the U.S. and Mexico express growing apprehension about NAFTA and its expansion to include much of Latin America, the evidence clearly shows that moving in the direction of the free movement of goods across national borders brings many benefits -- and not just to the pocketbook but also to the quality of life. In NAFTA we see, once again, that trade-related economic development is the best environmental policy, the best human rights policy and the best way to combat illegal immigration along a porous 2,000 mile border. By these measures, NAFTA is a good deal.

It’s better to wear out than rust out.” That is the message of Reboot! While American culture glamorizes the “Golden Years” of endless leisure and amusement, Phil Burgess rejects retirement, as he makes the case for returning to work in the post-career years, a time he calls later life.